DAVAO CITY (MindaNews / 10 Nov) – The military and the police are either clueless about the existence of the Bagani armed group in Arakan, North Cotabato, or just turning a blind eye on the group’s existence, according to members of the House Committee on Human Rights who conducted on-site hearings here.
[caption id="attachment_38453" align="alignleft" width="600"] Brigadier General Cesar Sedillo, Assistant Division Commander of the 6th Infantry Division answers questions from members of the Congressional Committee on Human Rights during a public hearing in Davao City on Friday, November 9. Sedillo was questioned regarding the killing of Italian missionary Fr. Fausto “Pops” Tentorio in Arakan, North Cotabato last year. Arakan is under the 6th ID. MindaNews Photo by Ruby Thursday More[/caption]
Both the military and the police admitted Friday that they do not have any idea whether or not the Bagani force, which is allegedly responsible for the killing of an Italian priest last year in Arakan Valley is an armed group, but said the group exists.
Fr. Fausto “Pops” Tentorio, a member of the Pontifical Institute for Foreign Missions (PIME), was shot in the compound of the Mother of Perpetual Help parish church in Arakan on Oct. 17, 2011.
At the two-day congressional hearing on human rights violations held here, some witnesses said Thursday the Bagani force was led by Jan Corbala, also known as Kumander Iring.
On the second day of the hearing, on Friday, military officials claimed that Corbala is a member of the Bagani, but he is not in any way officially connected with the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP).
The military also told the House Committee on Human Rights that they do not have any idea whether or not the Bagani group is armed.
Brig. Gen. Cesar Dionisio Sedillo, assistant commander of the 6th Infantry “Kampilan” Division, said “bagani” is the vernacular term of the indigenous people (IP) or the Lumads for “warrior.”
Bagani: a “tribe” or an armed group?
Brig. Gen. Domingo J. Tutaan Jr., AFP Human Rights Office chief, describes the Bagani as a certain tribe of the IP, citing that it is “something like Tausug, Maranao, and Bisaya or something like that.”
But ACT Teachers partylist Rep. Antonio Tinio countered that there is no IP group called Bagani.
“To my mind, Sir, there is a Pulang Bagani Command,” Tutaan replied, citing that it was under a certain Leoncio Pitao known to be operating here.
“Well, that would be an organization. Bagani is not a name of an indigenous group,” Tinio stressed.
Tinio asked the Eastern Mindanao Command (EastMinCom) for any information regarding the Bagani force. Tutaan said Bagani is “an ethnic arrangement as a tribe among the indigenous people.”
It was Lt. Col. Jose Maria Cuerpo II, commanding officer of the 8th Infantry Battalion, 4th Infantry Division, who told the body that as far as he knows, the tribe in Arakan is Pulanginon Manobo.
But Sedillo said that Bagani is integrated in the IP’s way of life because “as a tribe they should have an arrangement among themselves for security that goes also with other tribes.”
Asked by Tinio if Bagani members are warriors of the Pulanginon Manobo tribe, Sedillo said it was more on security arrangement, protecting their community and family.
“So they have guns to protect their life as part of their culture?” Rep. Neri Colmenares of Bayan Muna partylist asked the military official.
“I’m not in the position, your honor, but people do have guns. It’s their way of life,” Sedillo said.
“As far as EastMinCom is concerned, they are not aware of the existence of this warrior group in Arakan, this armed warrior group in Arakan. No one is aware in the EastMinCom,” Tinio said. “Again, your intelligence sources and your forces on the ground, you’re not aware that there are armed men, and that they are organized in some sort of paramilitary fashion. That’s why they have a commander. You don’t know this?” he asked.
Sedillo explained that during his term as commander of 602nd Infantry Brigade, which is based in North Cotabato, there was no formal organization such as the Bagani. “But in particular places wherein peace and order situation is affected, these people, indeed, formed certain activities to protect themselves.”
“Are they armed?” Tinio asked.
“Well, I don’t have data for that,” Sedillo replied.
Tinio said he was very disappointed that the military, considering their intelligence and other resources, cannot even categorically state whether or not there exists an armed group such as the Bagani.
He noted that witnesses who testified on Thursday stated outright that the Bagani is an armed group and it seems to be a common knowledge in the community.
Senior Supt Roque Alcantara, provincial director of the Philippine National Police (PNP) in North Cotabato, also said that he is not aware whether or not the Bagani is an armed group and that so far he has not received any complaint against this group.
“Do you know whether or not they are armed?” Tinio said.
“I don’t have any idea sir,” Alcantara replied.
“You don’t have any idea. I hope this committee will take note of this fact that both the PNP and the AFP seem to be totally unaware of the existence of this Bagani group,” Tinio stressed.
He added that the AFP and the PNP could have failed in their intelligence and information gathering or are only turning a blind eye on the existence of the Bagani group.
He suggested that the state forces immediately investigate to verify the existence of such group.
Consequently, the House committee directed the AFP, the PNP and the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) to furnish the committee with any information that they have regarding the Bagani group.
Lawyer Christina Hawtay Jovero, officer in charge of CHR-12, cited earlier in the hearing the allegations of the community and local non-government and civil society organizations that Corbala and the Bagani group are armed by the military.
Jovero agreed with Colmenares that the Bagani is “an unregulated armed group.” She said, however, that in her area, “there are a lot of IP groups and I believe that they are arming themselves to protect themselves.”
But she said that the CHR does not see the IP’s move of “arming themselves for protection” as legal, but based on its mandate, the CHR has “to monitor government compliance and look at the AFP, as well as law enforcement agencies, if they are doing something about that.”
House committee chair Rene Relampagos (1st Dist., Bohol), reminded Jovero about Section 18 of the Constitution, stating that “among others, the CHR shall provide appropriate legal measures for the protection of human rights of all persons within the Philippines, as well as Filipinos residing abroad.”
“And provide for preventive measures and legal aid services to the underprivileged whose human rights have been violated or in need for protection,” he added.
The House committee also directed the AFP to provide certification whether or not Corbala, Jimmy and Robert Ato are members of the AFP, Civilian Armed Forces Geographical Unit (CAFGU) or Special CAFGU Active Auxiliary. (Lorie Ann A. Cascaro / MindaNews)